Leading the Hybrid Workforce: How to Manage Humans and Agentic AI

If you have been leading teams for a while, you will likely be asked this question frequently by your team, other leaders, or even at a job or promotion interviews. ‘What’s your leadership philosophy?’

I still believe that, as a leader of people, this framework from a post I made a couple of years ago remains relevant. The 5 L’s of leadership by Pat Gelsinger. Listens, learns, Lifts, Links and Loves.

Fast forward to 2025, and the possibility of your next team member(s) being AI Agents or AI leaders, such as those from Agentic AI, means the leadership skills, approach, and framework need a much-needed upgrade.

Soon, leaders will guide two workforces: people and goal-driven software agents. That means taking care of logical needs, such as ensuring absolute goal clarity for the AI agents, while still catering to the emotional and developmental needs of the people on your team. Believe it or not, effective conflict management, trust building, practical rules, and skills that blend judgment with engineering will be essential between the two workforces. Anyone who has spent time in Digital transformation projects knows that a clear strategy, one that is complementary and not threatening to people, will only succeed.

Leadership stance for Human plus Agentic AI teams, a POV

Just like now, Business Unit leaders will make their own deployment decisions. BU leaders may consider these.

  1. Humans set purpose. People define mission, values, and what constitutes “right and ethical” outcomes. Basically, a human is in command.

  2. The first default option should always be to assist or augment before automating. Use agents to raise judgment and speed, keep accountability human.

  3. Impact before volume. Here, the effect is not just about costs; we must also consider customer preferences, customer value, quality, and proper risk assessment. I honestly hate the ‘I replaced or built my entire company on AI type of content I am seeing.’

  4. Innovate, experiment, and then scale to AI decisions that are more operationally focused on existing job workflows and work streams.

  5. Safety and privacy are the gold standards. Guardrails are part of the product, not an afterthought.

  6. As we have seen before, automation is protected from organisational silos. If you genuinely want agentic AI to work cross-functionally, then a single, collaborative vision remains imperative.

Skills to keep, strengthen, and add.

Keep

  • You will be challenged to scale and implement, but you may find that the available data is limited and outcomes are either inclusive or exceed the risk threshold. Courage to judge down solutions under uncertainty will be crucial.

  • Ethics and courage, the spine to say no when it matters. • Ability to explain decisions to internal and external stakeholders. Storytelling and thought leadership when change gets tricky.

  • Ability to explain decisions to internal and external stakeholders. Storytelling and thought leadership when change gets tricky.

Strengthen

  • Systems thinking, how people, data, and agents interact.

  • Change leadership, trust building by verification process, capability building, and steady communication.

  • Decision hygiene, pre- and post-mortems, and clear acceptance criteria.

Add

  • Clarity of Agent briefing and orchestration, goals, constraints, rewards, and handoffs.

  • Data and model literacy, inputs, evaluation, and failure modes.

  • Deep Workflow Prompt strategy and tool choice, making agents useful in real workflow scenarios. Great process documentation.

  • Guardrail design, privacy, bias controls, places and pauses for valid audits.

  • Human‑machine teaming, conflict management and escalation. Hold the line on rules and crisis recovery plans.

  • Outcome metrics that align agent behaviour with outcome, strategy and no conflict or breaches.

The mindset shifts.

An operating frame that encompasses components such as purpose, Guardrails, innovation appetite, heavy oversight, managing team conflicts, and finally Stewardship with accountability.

Clarity always beats micro-managing. Clarity also gives humans the permission to be creative. Verification and auditing early outcomes build trust.

What will you add to your leadership toolkit when you have Hybrid teams?

Jamshed Wadia

Business and Marketing Advisor @AIdeate | Advisory Board @CMO Council | AI Ethics & Governance @Mavic.AI | Startup Mentor @Eduspaze & @Tasmu | MarTech & AI Practitioner

https://aideatesolutions.com/
Previous
Previous

CMO Council's new Marketing Vitality Index

Next
Next

AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: What’s the Difference? (A Simple Guide)